Showing posts with label robot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label robot. Show all posts

Tuesday, 6 June 2017

How Do Robotic Lawn Mowers Work?

Before you buy a robotic lawn mower, it's worth knowing a bit about how they work so that you can make reasonable choices when confronted by a shop full of makes and models.

There are five general areas that are important to consider:

  • wheels: these vary in compound, size and arrangement;
  • control: how the mower drives around, and finds the edges;
  • cutting: there are different blade types and arrangements;
  • battery: all robot mowers are cordless;
  • programming: how easy are they to customise?
A robot mower is supposed to be a time-saving device. A true modern convenience. However, they tend to get a bad press, usually due to poor choices leading from misunderstandings around how they work.


Wheels

The mower will only be as good as its wheels and blades.

Both depend on the type of lawn. If it is undulating, and located in a part of the world which is frequently wet, then the wheels will have a big impact on the result.

Most robot lawn mowers have two drive wheels, and then one or more balancing wheels. The most common arrangement seems to be three wheels: with the two drive wheels at the nominal 'front' of the mower.

This is great for all round mowing, but tougher terrains will need mowers with more sophisticated arrangements, bigger drive wheels, and wider treads.

For example, the Robomow RX12U is a cheap, highly capable little robotic mower. But one look at it will tell you that if you ask it to mow a golf course, it's going to struggle.

Control

With very few exceptions (mainly robotic mowers used to cut large areas, like golf courses, for example) robot grass cutters use a wire to delimit the area that they are allowed to cut.

This also helps them to cut around the perimeter (so-called edge cutting mode) in certain models.

Husqvarna mowers (including Flymo and Gardena) also have a return wire that has two functions:

  • guide the robot home for charging;
  • start the mower from a predefined point on the perimeter wire.

This is a handy innovation for people who have lawns that are divided into zones by way of a small entry, such as a gate, or who have fairly large or irregularly shaped lawns where the mower runs the risk of missing far flung areas.

In these cases, better control of the mowing area is gained by running a wire from the base station to a far point on the perimeter wire. The mower will then, on occasion (and the frequency can be adapted in the menu) follow the wire to the end point and start cutting from there, rather than a point nearer the base station.

Newer, and more expensive, models are starting to use apps to offer better control and management over the mower, which is a trend that is very likely to continue, as is using a combination of GPS and perimeter wire.

Localised radio beacons are another control option (think of the Roomba, but outside), but these have yet to make a dent on the market; due to expense and complaints of radio wave pollution.

Cutting

Robot mowers use various blade arrangements. It's worth remembering that a robot mower is a battery powered machine, and as such weight is at a premium.

Single blades as found on traditional mowers are heavy, take a lot of energy to spin up and stop, and can create huge vibrations that make control of an autonomous nature difficult at best, and dangerous at worst.

Manufacturers of home robot lawn mowers have opted for multi-blade (usually three) cutting, usually based on a spinning disc and freely rotating blades with two or more cutting surfaces. The blades are thin, break easily, and need replacing during the season, but deliver a great cutting result.

Larger mowers, designed for bigger spaces, use single blades for robustness (such as the John Deere range of robot mowers), and some makes (such as Robomow) have slightly more robust, powered spinning blades that cost a lot more to replace, but which may be less prone to breakage.

However, the most cost effective option at the time of writing is a three bade arrangement on a spinning disc.

Battery

It's important to pick a mower that has the right level of autonomy for the lawn it will be cutting.

Lithium ion batteries are expensive, but charge quickly and can stand repeated discharge/recharge cycles without losing capacity.

For medium to large lawns, an Li based mower is clearly the best option.

However, for smaller lawns, a different approach can be used. To go back to the current low cost end of the market, the Robomow RX12U takes about 18 hours to recharge, but on a small lawn that doesn't matter, as it will usually be able to cut the whole lawn in a single session.

Programming

However, these cheaper mowers lack finesse in the amount of programming that can be done.

The Gardena R40Li for example, has a flexible cutting schedule, but even that pales into insignificance when compared to the top of the range Worx Landroids which interface with a mobile phone and can be tweaked in a variety of ways.

However, the more options you have, the more time it will take to set up the mower, and the more expensive it will be.

My advice would be that, unless you really need the flexibility to control when, how, and using what pattern the mower should cut the grass, then an entry level mower that is pre-programmed to mow at random and gives you options that are aimed more at convenience than precision is the best bet.

To find out more, check out our free automatic robotic lawn mowers buyer's guide!

Tuesday, 10 September 2013

Flymo, Bosch, or Husqvarna? The Best Robotic Lawn Mowers Revealed

The robotic lawn mower is a relatively new invention, but despite this, there seem to be a large number of models on the market, and choosing between them can be difficult. In this article, we will look at the latest models from the top three manufacturers - Flymo, Bosch and Husqvarna - to see what features they have, and what sets them apart from others on the market.

In fact, the first, the Flymo 400m, as pictured here, is a little bit of a cheat, as it appears to actually be a first or second generation Husqvarna that has been painted red.

The lawn mower, or one pictured remarkably like it, but in green, has also been marketed as a Gardena on the continent.

That's no surprise, as arguably Husqvarna are the international leaders in robotic automatic lawn mower technology. Their pre- and after-sales support is also pretty good, and these re-branded models offer excellent value for money.

They operate on the perimeter wire method, as do all the models featured in this article, since GPS location automatic mowers haven't proved to be as reliable as those that detect their operating area using a wire.

In case of obstacles (flower beds, garden furniture, pets or people, etc.) the mower has a bump bar around it, which triggers an automatic process that causes the mower to reverse, turn, and resume mowing.

The Bosch Indego, pictured here, bears a suspicious resemblance to the Flymo/Husqvarna, based on their online videos showing set up and operation. There is the same docking station arrangement, perimeter wire, and the shape looks familiar.

(Observant readers will notice that it appears to be the other way round, however, with the driving wheels at the back rather than the front.)

Those two holes on the front are for docking with the charging station : the Flymo docks 'backwards' which works well, but can fail on occasion if the installation instructions haven't been followed to the letter. Docking forwards might improve on this.

It also seems that the Bosch uses ultrasound rather than a bump bar for obstacle detection. Personally, I prefer the immediate physical presence of a bump bar, but ultrasound works well, too.

Both the Bosch and the Flymo use three spinning blades for cutting, which is also typical of Husqvarna lawn mowers. The Bosch appears to be able to use a straight-line method for mowing, whereas the Flymo uses an entirely random algorithm, as does the Gardena mower, which may also be a re-branded Husqvarna, at least in appearance.

All in all, there's not that much to choose between them, and it's arguable that unless you have a  lawn that is shaped oddly, or on the larger size, it's not worth the extra money going for the Bosch. The Flymo/Husqvarna/Gardena works well on lawns that are fairly regular in shape, and smallish.

Finally, Husqvarna also put out their automatic robotic lawn mowers under their own brand name. Here's the Automower 305, which ought to look familiar.

It will comfortably mow an area up to 500 square meters, or 1/4 of an acre, which puts it in the same league as the Flymo. The Bosch will do a bit more, and copes with inclines better.

However, the undisputed king of the robots has to be the Husqvarna 230. It can mow up to 3000 square meters, and deal with 35% inclines. It's also just a little more expensive than the 305.

For those who have done a bit of research, they'll know that there is, in fact, a Husqvarna 265, too.

It has 5 blades, rather than three, can converse with a smart phone, and has ultrasonic sensors that prevent hard knocks.

It's also very expensive, and is really only for those who have large lawns, with complex shapes, several zones, and who want a minute by minute update on their mower's status via their iPhone/Android.

All in all, depending on the size of lawn, you can't go wrong with any of these. The Bosch looks like a good bet for those who have a bit more to spend, and the Flymo is perfect for smaller, squarer, flatter lawns.

However, I would be tempted to go with the Husqvarna equivalents, as they are one of the market leaders, and their technology (and design) looks to have had a heavy influence on, if not been actively used for, other leading brands on the market.